Skip to main content

Forming a Systemic Design Team Workshop

RSD2 Workshop description AHO, Oslo October 9, 2013

The experience of becoming a member of a systemic design team

Harold Nelson, Ph.D.
Robert Sandusky, B. Arch, LA

A one-day workshop for experiencing systemic design teams as self-organizing social systems.

Participants in this workshop were presented with a series of guiding schemas for the overall workshop and for each of the three exercises. The exercises were a combination of individual and group work. The exercise was critiqued on how well participants thought they did in meeting the objective of the exercise, which was to experience a change in the interrelationships of an emerging systemic design team. The workshop was focused on creating an experience of three significant transformations in the evolution of a design team. It also included each individual reporting out reflectively the essence of their experiences—i.e. what would each participant take away from having had such experiences with others? Prospective participants were given the following descriptions of the workshop’s intention and design:

After you have been invited to work collaboratively with others on a design project how should you proceed? How do you become a catalyst in the self-organization of a systemic design team? Several key transformations between stable social systems states—individual, group, team, and design team— determine the ideal systemic process for design team formation. This workshop focuses on three qualitatively different transformations that you would experience sequentially in becoming a full-fledged systemic design team member.

Premise and intention of the workshop

Many things can be accomplished best when done collaboratively if the outcome of the collaboration is clear and simple. For example, Habitat for Humanity in the United States depends on motivated individuals showing up at the same place and time to build a home. Each day different individuals show up to donate a day of their time to a collaborative process. These strangers collaborate to accomplish something that is demanding yet straightforward. However, some things need to be done by groups of individuals working together as a high-performance, functional social system. When a challenge is complex, ambiguous, uncertain and consequential a whole new type of ‘collaboration’ is required— i.e. a systemic design team.

A systemic design team is not something you step into as an individual. It is something you, along with other participating individuals, transform into. A team does not automatically form as a result of a group of people—even highly skilled and intellectually competent people—gathering together (literally or virtually) in the same place at the same time. The existence of a team, particularly a systemic design team, is the consequence of a series of sequenced transformations in the interactions among a group of individuals—i.e. the results of the dynamics of a self-organizing social system.

The intention of this workshop is to have participants experience, in an abbreviated way, the transformation of an individual into a member of a group and a group becoming a team, and a team becoming a systemic design team—three of five fundamental and necessary transformations. The intention of the workshop is not to have participants experience being a group, a team, or a systemic design team. The intention is to experience the transformation between these systemic states.

Design of workshop

The transformations focused on in this workshop occur in between the system states of group, team, and design team (although there are other transformations in the full self-organizing process). Time constraints (one-day workshop) require that the workshop would focus on only three transformations and that the experiences would only be foreshortened simulations of what would take place in real-time during an actual team formation.

The workshop is a balance between preparation and action. The theoretical foundation of the workshop as a whole is introduced at the beginning of the workshop followed by three experiential activities, each focused on a particular type

of transformation. The exercises developed to facilitate the experiencing of these transformations are limited to three of several that could be used in a longer, more enhanced workshop or in an actual facilitated process of team development.This workshop consists of a sequence of systemically integrated exercises that simulate the different transformational states a group of individuals experience as they transition from being a gathering of individuals to being a cohesive group to being a productive team, to becoming a systemic design team. This is just a simulation of course since, in reality, such transformations would typically take a considerable amount more time to complete. However, participants will leave having experienced the essence of such transformation along with an intellectual framework—i.e. schema—tying the experiences into a coherent systemic whole.

This experiential learning event will be a simulation of the experiences of shifting from the role of a highly competent individual to becoming a member of a functioning group—a social system—to becoming an integral member of a team—an organizational system—to becoming a constituent member of a systemic design team—a purpose-driven social system.

The exercises are based on three forms of formal design communication that facilitate systemic transformations—i.e. conversation, dialogue, and graphologue.

A transformation that occurs from the beginning of the process—centering—is highly personal and is not included in this workshop although it would be essential to include in a more comprehensive workshop as well as for any real-world project. In this workshop, this transformational activity is assumed to be in place sufficiently to support the next transformation of individual to group.

Successful engagement in a formal systemic design conversation, dialogue, and graphologue results in qualities and attributes necessary for the vital performance of each systemic state—such as trust and agency for group activity for example. These are necessary outcomes whether the transformation process concludes in an intermediate terminal state such as a functional group, as a team, or continues on to become a systemic design team.

The exercises chosen for this workshop include sharing personal design critiques, formulating a shared understanding of systemic design, and determining a set of desired protocols for team interactions. At the end of each exercise, participants will reflect on the experience of the exercise in both professional and academic terms. A brief discussion will be held to tie the experiences together into a coherent whole and to contextualize them in the larger more comprehensive process beginning with deeper personal transformations and ending in the work of a design cohort—a holistic interrelationship between clients and a systemic design team.


Popular posts from this blog

Design, Wicked Problems & Throwness

Horst Rittel is one of the seminal residents in my 'Berkeley Bubble'. Recently a friend and colleague sent me an article about ‘double-wickedproblems’ . I have become ever more aware of the increasing number of references to ‘wicked problems’ in all forms of media that seem to have missed Rittel’s deeper insights . This brought up the concern I have about the use and miss-use of the term ‘wicked problem’.  The term ‘wicked problem’, first introduced by Rittel in West Churchman’s seminars at Berkeley, was in reference to his conceptualization of the impossible challenge of dealing with significant social issues using traditional, rational, ‘problem solving’ methods. In most cases what are miss-diangnosed as ‘wicked problems’ are actually complex or complicated problems that can be simplified or broken into smaller 'tame' problems allowing for a straight forward 'problem solving' approach to be taken. This approach is believed by many to be capable

Center for Systemic Design draft prospectus

    PROSPECTUS Center for Advanced Systemic Designing Introduction  Our futures can be approached in four ways: 1) drifting—adapting to whatever happens,  2) colliding—reacting and enduring,  3) retreating—backing away from undesirable states or conditions, or   4) advancing—navigating into desirable states-of-affairs. The norm nowadays is to drift, collide or retreat into the future. The fourth approach, the proactive approach, is the more apt response given the complex challenges and rising expectations that are the new norm for the foreseeable future.  The fourth approach depends on the agency of individuals who have the capacity to handle the challenge of securing desired outcomes in indeterminate situations on behalf of concomitant stakeholders and clients. They achieve this by serving—design agency—as members of design teams and design cohorts. These systemic designers are skilled polymaths who have the ability to create assemblies of essential elements into coherent whole system

Ethics and Design

A recent article in Fast Company, titled “ Stanford’s Most Popular Class ...”, dealt with a class titled ‘Designing Your Life’.   The first time I was introduced to the idea that one could 'design' their life was when I was a graduate student at Berkeley. Over the years, My friend and mentor C. West Churchman —a polymath Professor at UC Berkeley—had written and lectured on the concept of the ‘Design of a Life’ with a focus on questions of ethics in whole systems. He was very concerned with the ethical behavior of individuals within business, governmental and institutional organizations as they ‘designed’ or planned interventions in complex social systems. Ethics was at the center of designing behavior from West’s perspective. West Churchman and Harold Nelson, Mill Valley, CA (1990's) Reading further in the Fast Company article on Stanford’s class, Bill Burnett—the Executive Director of Stanford’s design program—is quoted as saying: … "Design doesn’t s